English, British
ADDITINF
Y
Class
Transport
COMP1
Barbara Harbottle
COMP2
Barbara Harbottle
DAY1
01
DAY2
26
District
Sunderland
Easting
435100
Grid ref figure
6
Map Sheet
NZ35NE
MONTH1
09
MONTH2
02
Grid Reference
NZ
NMRNUMBER
NZ 35 NE 61
Northing
556900
General Period
UNCERTAIN
Specific Period
Uncertain
Place
Hylton
Description
Two possible Roman crossings of the Wear have been suggested, one at Ford, the other at Hylton. There are two separate accounts of a mass of laid stone across the Wear at Hylton, with an oak framework, decorated stones, a lead inscription, and evidence for the use of cramps. Since most of this structure was removed in 1865, it is now impossible to determine whether this was indeed a Roman structure, and whether it functioned as a bridge or causeway. Recent authors have tended not to claim a Roman road in this locality.
Site Type: Broad
Road Transport Site
SITEDESC
Two possible Roman crossings of the Wear have been suggested, one at Ford, the other at Hylton. The first was an inference by Longstaffe, supported later by a Roman milestone supposed to have been found at Ford. Since this was in fact the Ford near Lanchester this notion can be discounted. There are two separate accounts of a mass of laid stone across the Wear at Hylton, with an oak framework, decorated stones, a lead inscription, a voussoir and evidence for the use of cramps. There has in the past been disagreement as to whether this structure (much of which was removed in 1865) was a causeway or the remains of a bridge. More recently Dymond has come down in favour of a bridge, perhaps with a causeway as well, and puts it in his Class C, ("Sites where remains exist or have existed, and there is reasonable certainty that they are Roman"). Selkirk prefers a Roman dam, while Bidwell and Holbrook doubt if the structure was Roman. No claim has been made in recent times for the existence of a Roman road in this area.
Site Name
Hylton, crossing of the River Wear
Site Type: Specific
Ford
HER Number
286
Form of Evidence
Documentary Evidence
Sources
<< HER 286 >> R. Surtees, 1820, History of...Durham, II, pp. 306-07, 317
W.H.D. Longstaffe, 1858, Durham before the Conquest, Proceedings of the Archaeological Institute Newcastle, I, p. 61
Rev. Dr. Hooppell, 1885, A Further Account of Traces pf a Roman Bridge at Hylton,Proceedings of the Society of Antiquaries of Newcastle, 2, I (for 1883-4), pp. 134-8
F. Haverfield & Rev. W. Featherstonhaugh, 1891, Hylton Ford, Proceedings of the Society of Antiquaries of Newcastle, 2, IV (for 1889-90), pp. 230-1
E. Birley, 1939, Roman Inscriptions from Chesters...and two Milestones, Archaeologia Aeliana, 4, XVI, pp. 257-9
D.P. Dymond, 1963, Roman Bridges on Dere Street, County Durham, Archaeological Journal, Vol. 118 (for 1961), p. 151
R. Selkirk, 1983, The Piercebridge Formula, pp. 77-8
P.T. Bidwell & N. Holbrook, 1989, Hadrian's Wall Bridges, pp. 112-13
Proceedings of the Society of Antiquaries of Newcastle, 3, I, 98-9
YEAR1
1990
YEAR2
1996
English, British
ADDITINF
Y
Class
Defence
COMP1
Barbara Harbottle
COMP2
Claire MacRae
DAY1
28
DAY2
22
District
Newcastle
Easting
425550
Grid ref figure
8
HISTORY_TOPIC
Civil War
Map Sheet
NZ26SE
MONTH1
08
MONTH2
12
Grid Reference
NZ
Northing
564850
General Period
POST MEDIEVAL
Specific Period
Stuart 1603 to 1714
Place
Shieldfield
Description
The fort was certainly in existence early in 1644 and probably built after 1639. A contemporary description of "Sheiffield Fort" describes it as square in plan, standing to a moderate height with a four-cornered Bastion at every angle and a wooden drawbridge at its entrance. In February 1644 it fell to the Scots and in the autumn of that year was heavily damaged, subsequently repaired in 1648. It was still visible in late 19th century between Christ Church Shieldfield and Ridley Villas, at which time is was said to measure 67 yards x 67 yards.
SITEASS
It might be possible to recover some evidence by excavation if an opportunity arose in the yards or back lane on the north side of Ridley Villas. The fort is important because few of these rare detached defensive outworks have been studied. Within Newcastle, this is the only attested detached defensive outwork within a wider planned scheme of defence. It is also a valuable source for the study of the Civil War period in general as it was occupied for at least a year.
Site Type: Broad
Fort
SITEDESC
In existence early in 1644; date of construction 1643 as part of Mayor Sir John Marley's attempts to refortify the town. Lithgow's contemporary description: "Upon the Townes Northeast side, and a little without, there was a fortress erected, called Sheiffield Fort, standing on a moderate height…; It standeth squarely quadrangled, with a foure cornered Bastion at every angle, and all of them thus quadrat, they are composed of earth and watles; having the North-east side of one bulwarke pallosaded, the rest not, save along the top of the worke about, they had laid Masts of Ships to beat down the assailants with their tumbling force. At the entrie whereof there is a wooden drawbridge, and within it two Courts du guard, the graffe without is dry and of small importance…". In Feb 1644 fell to the Scots, and in the autumn of that year was slighted by the defenders. Apparently repaired in 1648. Built on high ground within cannon range of the walled town. McKenzie refers to visible remains of the "great fort" in 1827. Still visible in late19th century between Christ Church Shieldfield and Ridley Villas - Oliver's map of 1830 shows what appears to be the north-east bastion of the fort. Lithgow's description suggests that the fort was a roughly square earthwork with projecting bastions at each corner, surrounded by a ditch, known as a sconce or star-fort. It is possible however that this feature was of a more irregular shape. Said by Warburton to measure 67 yards x 67 yards, bastion 20 yards each way. No trace of the fort was found during an archaeological evaluation by The Archaeological Practice Ltd. In 2010 nor during an evaluation in the same year by NPA Ltd.
Site Name
Shieldfield fort
Site Type: Specific
Artillery Fort
HER Number
285
Form of Evidence
Documentary Evidence
Sources
<< HER 285 >> C.S. Terry, 1889, The Scottish Campaign in Northumberland and Durham...1644, Archaeologia Aeliana, 2, XXI, pp. 159-60
C.S. Terry, 1889, The Siege of Newcastle-upon-Tyne by the Scots in 1644, Archaeologia Aeliana, 2, XXI, pp. 207, 212
Common Council Books, 1648, Shieldfield Fort, 589/5 (1650-9), p. 113 - Tyne and Wear Archive Services
T. Oliver, 1830, Newcastle upon Tyne
R.J. Charleton, (date unknown) Newcastle, pp. 56, 371
M. Ellison & B. Harbottle, 1983, The Excavation of a 17th-Century Bastion in the Castle of Newcastle, Archaeologia Aeliana, 5, XI, 138-9
J. Brand, 1789, Newcastle upon Tyne, I, 442 and n.
A. Morgan, 1995, Bygone Shieldfield
Tyne and Wear Museums, 2004, Ridley Villas, New Bridge Street, Newcastle - Archaeological Assessment; The Archaeological Practice Ltd. 2014, 95-113 New Bridge Street, Newcastle upon Tyne - Archaeological Evaluation, NPA Ltd., 2010, Back New Bridge Street, Newcastle upon Tyne - Archaeological Evaluation
SURVIVAL
None
YEAR1
1990
YEAR2
2014
English, British
ADDITINF
Y
AREA_STAT
Conservation Area
Class
Religious Ritual and Funerary
COMP1
Barbara Harbottle
COMP2
Claire MacRae
CONDITION
Fair
DAY1
20
DAY2
16
District
Gateshead
Easting
425430
Grid ref figure
8
Map Sheet
NZ26SE
MATERIAL
Sandstone
MONTH1
08
MONTH2
06
Grid Reference
NZ
NMRNUMBER
NZ 26 SE 59
Northing
563680
General Period
MEDIEVAL
Specific Period
Medieval 1066 to 1540
Place
Gateshead
Description
The church is of Norman origin - the evidence includes the hoodmould of the south door of the nave decorated by the nutmeg motif. There are signs of many later additions, alterations and replacements, particularly in the 12th, 14th and 15th centuries. Later restoration work occurred in 1740, c. 1773, 1838-9, 1854 & 1874-5. LISTED GRADE 1
SITEASS
The church was damaged by fire in 1979, and again in 1983.
Restoration has left the chancel roofless, the anchorage has been
demolished and the nave converted for use by Phillips,
Auctionee (1990). Now heritage centre (2009).
Site Type: Broad
Place of Worship
SITEDESC
Certainly of Norman origin, the evidence being the S door of the nave ("with hoodmould decorated by that Durham favourite, the nutmeg motif..."), and in the N wall of the chancel a window, with widely splayed jambs and internal roll moulding. The date is disputed: (7) gives various dates for the different bits, 1080+, mid C12, end of C12, and (17) just c. 1200. Ryder states that the church was already a sizeable cruciform church by the later 12th century and that there was a smaller church on the site by 1080. The aisled nave of 5 bays dates from C14, its octagonal piers lacking capitals like Newcastle St. Nicholas. The nave roof is a C15 replacement, and the transepts C15 additions or replacements. In 1340 a licence was granted for the erection of an anchorage which was sited on the N side of the chancel, and rebuilt in 18th century or 19th century for use as school and vestry. There have been several major buildings/restorations: tower and W end of nave in 1740, upper parts of tower altered c. 1773, 1838-9, much of the chancel and the windows of nave and aisles by Dobson after damage in the fire of 1854, 1874-5. The tower was rebuilt by George Cansfield in classical style 1739-40. Restoration in 1874 by Austin, Johnson and Hicks. A fire in 1979 within the church destroyed much of the Victorian stained glass and furniture and signalled the end of the buildings as a working church. Another fire in 1983 destroyed the roof and the vestry. In 1988 prior to the restoration and conversion of the church, evaluation trenches were excavated below the church floor. The foundations of the C12 walls were seen to lie only 30cm below ground surface. An undisturbed burial was found at a depth of 80cm. In 1990 the building became an auction house before being converted into a visitor centre in 2003. In 2009 it became a heritage centre. Dated C12th.
Site Name
Church Street, Church of St. Mary
Site Type: Specific
Parish Church
SITE_STAT
Listed Building Grade I
HER Number
284
Form of Evidence
Extant Building
Sources
<< HER 284 >> W. Hutchinson, 1787, History of...Durham, II, 466-9
R. Surtees, 1820, History of...Durham, II, 118-25
W.H. Knowles & J.R. Boyle, 1890, Vestiges of old Newcastle and Gateshead, pp. 137-49
W.H. Wood, 1909, Ancient Grave Cross,Proceedings of the Society of Antiquaries of Newcastle, 3, III (for 1907-08), 318-19
C.H.H. Blair, 1931, Armorials in the Parish Church of St. Mary, Gateshead, Proceedings of the Society of Antiquaries of Newcastle, 4, IV (for 1929-30), pp. 209-11
M.H. Dodds,ed. 1951, Extracts from the Churchwardens' Accounts of St. Mary's Parish Church, Proceedings of the Society of Antiquaries of Newcastle, 4, XI, 101-14, 186-8, 205-16, 224-8, 295-7, 336-43, 368-74
E.M. Smith, 1964, The Parish Church of Gateshead, St. Mary the Virgin, pp. 1-47
N. Pevsner, revised E. Williamson, 1983, The Buildings of England: County Durham pp. 282-3
D. Passmore, 198?, Trial Trenches at St. Mary's Church, Gateshead: Excavation Report
Durham Records Office Parish Records, St. Mary's Church, Gateshead; Thomas Oliver, 1844, Historical and Descriptive Reference to the Public Buildings on the Plan of the Borough of Newcastle upon Tyne and Gateshead; Grace McCombie, 2009, Newcastle and Gateshead - Pevsner Architectural Guide, p. 14, 29; Thomas Oliver, 1830, Plan of St. Mary's (re-seating) held by Lambeth Palace; NPA, 2010, Gateshead Visitor Centre, St. Mary's Church, Gateshead - Archaeological evaluation, excavation and watching brief report; Ryder, P. 2011, Historic Churches of County Durham, p101
SURVIVAL
60-79%
YEAR1
1990
YEAR2
2015
English, British
ADDITINF
Y
Class
Defence
COMP1
Barbara Harbottle
COMP2
Jennifer Morrison
CONDITION
Fair
Crossref
276, 277
DAY1
01
DAY2
25
District
Gateshead
Easting
426900
Grid ref figure
8
Map Sheet
NZ25NE
MONTH1
08
MONTH2
04
Grid Reference
NZ
Northing
559050
General Period
ROMAN
Specific Period
Roman 43 to 410
Place
Wrekenton
Description
In the north-west angle formed by Easedale Gardens and the Pelaw Main wagonway, on Ravensworth Golf Course, there is a raised platform with a typically rounded Roman corner. The top of the platform has medieval rig and furrows and one side has been landscaped away. The prominent corner is full of stone and there appears to be a bank round the top of the two visible sides. The site is close to the junction of two Roman roads, Chester-le-Street to the Tyne, and the Wrekendyke.
SITEASS
Positive identification will require excavation, e.g. a section through the east boundary. The site was visited by J.N. Rimmington of English Heritage in December 1998 as part of the Monument Protection Programme. The report concludes that the monument is c200m long, orientated northwest to southeast. Its width is obscured by modern development. The interior of the fort is devoid of features relating to a fort due to the obscuring nature of the ridge and furrow. The north corner of the monument contains stone and has been interpreted as a built rampart. The monument is in a good tactical and stratgic position, and tactically, commands an eminence with dropping ground in all directions. Strategically it controls the Team Valley and has views of the upper Tyne Valley. The monument is managed as a golf course. There are minor levelling works for greens or tees, but the majority of the area remains undisturbed. The monument was not recommended for scheduling because its identification as a Roman Fort was not considered sufficiently secure. Scheduling would be considered in the future however, if new evidence confirms its identity as a Roman fort. Any disturbance to the site or its environs should be monitored through the development control process. A watching brief during construction of houses on the site of the golf course club house did not record any archaeological deposits (2005).
Site Type: Broad
Fort
SITEDESC
In the north-west angle formed by Easedale Gardens and the Pelaw Main wagonway, on Ravensworth Golf Course, there is a raised platform "with a typically rounded Roman corner. The top of the platform has medieval rig and furrows and one side has been landscaped away. The prominent corner is full of stone". There appears to be a bank round the top of the two visible sides. The site is close to the junction of two Roman roads, Chester-le-Street to the Tyne, and the Wrekendyke.
Site Name
Wrekenton, possible Roman fort
Site Type: Specific
Fort
HER Number
283
Form of Evidence
Earthwork
Sources
<< HER 283 >> Aerial Photograph, R. Selkirk, 1983, The Piercebridge Formula, p. 43
Aerial Photograph, R.Selkirk, 1977, Wrekenton golf course, - ? Roman fort, 17.xi.1977, S 96-101 -Museum of Antiquities
J.N. Rimmington, English Heritage 1998 Alternative Action Report
SURVIVAL
20-39%
YEAR1
1990
YEAR2
2006
English, British
ADDITINF
N
Class
Monument <By Form>
COMP1
Barbara Harbottle
COMP2
Barbara Harbottle
DAY1
07
DAY2
26
District
Sunderland
Easting
440640
Grid ref figure
8
Map Sheet
NZ45SW
MONTH1
08
MONTH2
02
Grid Reference
NZ
NMRNUMBER
NZ 45 SW 11
Northing
553780
General Period
ROMAN
Specific Period
Roman 43 to 410
Place
Sunderland
Description
A 4th century Roman coin (Emperor's name not given) was found in the garden of 77 Lynthorpe in 1963.
SITEASS
Is it a museum accession or merely a museum record? Has it any real significance?
Site Type: Broad
Findspot
SITEDESC
"A 4th century Roman coin (Emperor's name not given) found in the garden of 77 Lynthorpe by G. Jackson in 1963". Dated C4.
Site Name
Sunderland, Roman coin
Site Type: Specific
Coin
HER Number
282
Form of Evidence
Find
Sources
<< HER 282 >> Ordnance Survey archaeological record card, RPM, 1977, Roman coin
YEAR1
1990
YEAR2
1996
English, British
ADDITINF
Y
Class
Domestic
COMP1
Barbara Harbottle
COMP2
Claire MacRae
DAY1
01
DAY2
10
District
Outside
Easting
430900
Grid ref figure
6
Map Sheet
NZ34NW
MONTH1
07
MONTH2
10
Grid Reference
NZ
Northing
549400
General Period
MEDIEVAL
Specific Period
Medieval 1066 to 1540
Place
Morton Grange
Description
With 16 farmers holding 25 oxgangs (each of 12 acres) this was a substantial village in the late 12th century. By c. 1380 5 bond tenants held a total of 14 messuages and 22 bovates (each of 12 acres). perhaps suggesteing some shrinkage by then. In the early 15th century the manor of Morton was held by the Lumleys; in the late 15th century the bishop leased it to Richard Errington; and in 1525 Wolsey leased the manor and grange to Richard Belasyse, while Sir Richard Belasis held the "Manor Farme or Towne of Morton" in 1647. In the late 17th or early 18th century the estate was sold to John Lambton. Today it is a single farm, with a large stone farmhouse and some unimpressive farm buildings.
SITEASS
Site is probably Morton Grange, the name of the township on the Tithe Map, rather than Morton Hall. No earthworks known, but aerial photos should be checked, and field walking might help.
Site Type: Broad
Settlement
SITEDESC
With 16 farmers holding 25 oxgangs (each of 12 acres) this was a substantial village in the late C12. By c. 1380 5 bond tenants held a total of 14 messuages and 22 bovates (each of 12 acres). Does this suggest shrinkage even then, and amalgamation of holdings? In the early C15 the manor of Morton was held by the Lumleys; in the late C15 the bishop leased the manor or vill of Morton to Richard Errington; in 1525 Wolsey leased the manor and grange to Richard Belasyse, and Sir Richard Belasis held the "Manor Farme or Towne of Morton" in 1647 when it was described as already enclosed. In the late C17/early 18th century the estate was sold to John Lambton. Today it is a single farm, with a large stone farmhouse and some unimpressive farm buildings. Whelan (1856) lists the township as having a population in 1801 of 188; in 1811, 251; in 1821, 308; in 1831, 295; in 1841, 185 and in 1851, 185 souls. The lord of the manor and principal landowner is Earl of Durham. Dated C12th.
Site Name
Morton village (Morton Grange)
Site Type: Specific
Shrunken village
HER Number
281
Form of Evidence
Documentary Evidence
Sources
<< HER 281 >> W. Greenwell, ed. 1852, Boldon Buke, Surtees Society, 25, pp.
W. Greenwell, ed. 1856, Bishop Hatfield's Survey, Surtees Society,56, p. 161
D.A. Kirby, ed. 1972, Parliamentary Surveys of the Bishopric of Durham, Surtees Society, II 185, pp.
Surtees Society, Halmote Court Rolls, p. 199
Dept. Pal. & Dip. Durham, Tithe Awards, 1840, Morton Grange
Dept. Pal. & Dip. Durham, Ordnance Survey Maps, 1st ed. 1:2500 Durham XX.3
W. Hutchinson, 1787, History of...Durham, II, p. 722
R.Surtees, 1816, History of...Durham, I, p. 202; Whellan, W, 1856, History, Topography, and Directory of the County Palatine of Durham
YEAR1
1990
YEAR2
2014
English, British
ADDITINF
Y
AREA_STAT
Conservation Area
Class
Domestic
COMP1
Barbara Harbottle
COMP2
Claire MacRae
Crossref
268, 269, 270
DAY1
09
DAY2
13
District
Sunderland
Easting
434600
Grid ref figure
6
HEIGHT_OD
80
Map Sheet
NZ34NW
MONTH1
07
MONTH2
10
Grid Reference
NZ
Northing
549600
General Period
MEDIEVAL
Specific Period
Medieval 1066 to 1540
Place
Houghton-le-Spring
Description
The earliest documentary reference to Houghton-le-Spring village is 1112. At the time of Boldon Buke (a 1183 survey of land belonging to the Bishop of Durham, Hugh du Puiset) it was clearly an important centre of the Bishop's estate, with a number of tradesmen listed. In the 14th century 4 free tenants, 23 tenants of demesne lands, a watermill, brewhouse, oven and onetime forge are listed. It still shows as a large, prosperous village on 17th and 18th century maps.
SITEASS
The damage has been done by the division of the village into two by the chasm of the bypass. Further documentary research needed.
Site Type: Broad
Settlement
SITEDESC
The earliest documentary reference is 1112. At the time of Boldon Buke (a 1183 survey of land belonging to the Bishop of Durham, Hugh du Puiset) Houghton (Ottona) was clearly an important centre of the Bishop's estate, - 13 cotmen, 3 half cotmen, bailiff, smith, carpenter, pounder, with work services owed from other vills. Temp. Hatfield's Survey 4 free tenants, 23 tenants of demesne lands, extensive bond lands and exchequer lands, watermill, brewhouse, oven, onetime forge. Described by Surtees as one of the great copyhold manors of the see of Durham, as well as the centre of an extensive parish. Originally a substantial village, still showing its C17 and 18th century prosperity, on an E-W axis. At the W end is the rectory, separated from the church by the main road from Durham, then the church on the N side of Church Street, in the centre Quality Hill (now Nesham Place) with Houghton Hall on its SW corner, and at the E end, awkwardly attached, Market Place. In 1483 Bishop Dudley granted leave to the rector “to enclose and fortify and embattle a tower” (removed in the late 18th century). In 1574 the Kepier Grammar School was founded and built, and in 1668 the Davenport and Lilburne almshouses were constructed. By 1794 Houghton-le-Spring township has a population of 996 persons in 225 families. Further expansion led to the establishment of a weekly market by 1825; around the same time there were 21 inns and public houses, 2 beer shops and a large brewery on the Durham road. In 1829 Houghton Colliery opened employing over one thousand people. Whelan (1856) lists the township as having a population in 1801 of 996; in 1811, 1356; in 1821, 2905; in 1831, 3917; in 1841, 3433 and in 1851, 4075 souls. By 1891 the population had risen to 37, 921 on account of the collieries and quarries in the area. The landowners in 1856 were the Earl of Durham, Marchioness of Londonderry, the Hon. And Rev. John Grey, Thomas Robinson, M.D.C. Moneypenny and Mr Back. Terraced housing was built on the north side of the town. Large handsome houses were built on Nesham Place. Houghton Feast is an annual festival which has been enjoyed every October for 800 years. Bernard Gilpin introduced the roasting of an ox to the festival in the 16th century. Today Newbottle Street is the main street. Originally called Newbottle Lane, the shops were all on the east side. The properties on the west side were not added until 1907. Newbottle Street became prominent after Sunderland Street was demolished in the 1960s to build the A690. Dated C12th.
Site Name
Houghton-le-Spring village
Site Type: Specific
Village
HER Number
280
Form of Evidence
Documentary Evidence
Sources
<< HER 280 >> W. Greenwell, ed. 1852, Boldon Buke, Surtees Society, 25, pp. 7, 46-48;
W. Greenwell, ed. 1856, Bishop Hatfield's Survey, Surtees Society,56, pp. 153-157;
D.A. Kirby, ed. 1972, Parliamentary Surveys of the Bishopric of Durham, Surtees Society, II 185, pp. 142-154;
Dept. Pal. & Dip. Durham, Halmote Court Books, 1631, Houghton-le-Spring townfields 76, ff. 427-30;
Dept. Pal. & Dip. Durham, Halmote Court Books, 1634, Houghton-le-Spring townfields 77, ff. 1171-2;
Dept. Pal. & Dip. Durham, Halmote Court Additional Maps and Plans, 1839, Sale of land at Houghton-le-Spring, 26a;
Dept. Pal. & Dip. Durham, Halmote Court Additional Maps and Plans, (date unknown) Plan of house and land at Houghton-le-Spring, 26b;
Dept. Pal. & Dip. Durham, Halmote Court Additional Maps and Plans, (date unknown) Plan of Houghton and Newbottle with landholders, mid and late 19th century, 26g;
Dept. Pal. & Dip. Durham, Tithe Awards, 1840, Houghton-le-Spring ;
Dept. Pal. & Dip. Durham, Ordnance Survey maps, 1st ed. 1:2500 Durham XIII.16; Paul Lanagan, 2013, www.houghtonlespring.org.uk; Newcastle University, 2011-12, Higher Education Field Academy North East Project Report; Whellan, W, 1856, History, Topography, and Directory of the County Palatine of Durham
YEAR1
1990
YEAR2
2014
English, British
ADDITINF
N
Class
Agriculture and Subsistence
COMP1
Barbara Harbottle
COMP2
Barbara Harbottle
Crossref
272
DAY1
09
DAY2
08
District
Sunderland
Easting
433000
Grid ref figure
4
Map Sheet
NZ34NW
MONTH1
07
MONTH2
03
Grid Reference
NZ
Northing
547000
parish
Hetton
General Period
MEDIEVAL
Specific Period
Medieval 1066 to 1540
Place
Middle Rainton
Description
In origin Rainton manor was part of the ancient estate of St. Cuthbert and property of the prior and convent of Durham. It was, however, specifically described as the manor of "Estrainton" in the bursar's account of 1365-6. In 1350-1 there is record of the building of a new grange there.
SITEASS
Not certainly located. The manor was divided into eight (when?), and it has so far been impossible to prove that the likely Grange Farm (Middle Rainton) is the true site.
Site Type: Broad
Manor
SITEDESC
In origin Rainton manor was part of the ancient estate of St. Cuthbert. The property of the prior and convent of Durham, it was usually called Rainton manor. It was, however, specifically described as the manor of "Estrainton", let for 5 pounds p.a., in the bursar's account of 1365-6. A cursory examination of the bursar's accounts for 1345-81 suggests that this manor was usually let, but at the time of the Black Death it was in hand and run by a sergeant (1349- 52), and in 1350-1 there is record of the building of a new grange there.
Site Name
Rainton manor
Site Type: Specific
Manor
HER Number
279
Form of Evidence
Documentary Evidence
Sources
<< HER 279 >> Prior's Kitchen Durham, Durham Dean and Chapter MSS, med. Bursar's account rolls
J. Fielding, 1980, A Study of the Buildings on the Bursar's Manors of Durham Cathedral Priory, Durham University Unpublished M.A. thesis, passim
W. Greenwell, ed. 1871, Feodarium Prioratus Dunelmensis, Surtees Society, Vol. 58, pp.
Prior's Kitchen Durham, Church Commission, 1840, C.C. no. 13661
Prior's Kitchen Durham, Halmote Books, 1409; Hetton Local & Natural History Society, 2015, The Hetton Village Atlas p130
YEAR1
1990
YEAR2
1996
English, British
ADDITINF
Y
Class
Domestic
COMP1
Barbara Harbottle
COMP2
Barbara Harbottle
DAY1
05
DAY2
08
District
Sunderland
Easting
433700
Grid ref figure
6
HEIGHT_OD
140
Map Sheet
NZ34NW
MONTH1
07
MONTH2
03
Grid Reference
NZ
Northing
545800
parish
Hetton
General Period
MEDIEVAL
Specific Period
Medieval 1066 to 1540
Place
Moorsley
Description
Moreslawe was first mentioned in the 12th century when there was one grant (perhaps 2) of land there to the prior and convent of Durham. In 1345/6 there were 10 tenants holding between them 12 tofts with acreages ranging from 4-32, but in 1539 and 1580 there were just 3 tenants, all paying the same rent. In early 19th century plan shows little change, but there had been expansion by the mid 19th century, with 2 terraces typical of mining settlements being built in the south-east quarter. The village seems to have comkprises a wide green or street with one farm on the north, 2 farms and 3 smallholdings on south, a lane coming in from the west and a road out to Hetton on the east. Very little of this layout survives.
SITEASS
Should there be excavation if there are to be any more changes, unlikely? Certainly there should be documentary research, particularly for the later period. Could the ?pub, rather disguised now, in fact be an earlier survival?
Site Type: Broad
Settlement
SITEDESC
"Moreslawe", which Greenwell believed originally to have been the moor of Rainton, was first mentioned in the C12 when there was one grant (perhaps 2) of land there to the prior and convent of Durham. In 1345/6 there were 10 tenants holding between them 12 tofts with acreages ranging from 4-32, but by 1539 there were just 3 tenants, and again in 1580, all paying the same rent. A plan and terrier of 1805 suggest there may have been little change, other than perhaps enclosure, in the intervening period. A wide green or street had one farm on N, 2 farms and 3 smallholdings on S, a lane coming in from W, and road out to Hetton on E. The farms were all of c. 140 acres. There had been expansion by the mid C19, 2 terraces typical of mining settlements being built in the SE quarter, but today this has been landscaped away, and all that survives is the SW farm, a small terrace on the N side, and ?onetime pub on the S. The north row had largely vanished by 1805. Described by Ian Nairn in 1964 as 'not much now, and steadily getting less as the farms shrink and the old mining rows are pulled down. Yet a fine site, a green on a ridge-top with a view out over the whole of northern Durham'. Dated C12th.
Site Name
Moorsley village (High Moorsley)
Site Type: Specific
Shrunken village
HER Number
278
Form of Evidence
Documentary Evidence
Sources
<< HER 278 >> W. Greenwell, ed. 1871, Feodarium Prioratus Dunelmensis, Surtees Society, 58, pp. lxxxiii, 94, 126-7, 313
Surtees Society, almote Court Rolls,pp. 3, 63, 151, 221
Prior's Kitchen Durham, Durham Dean and Chapter MSS, med.
Prior's Kitchen Durham,Church Commission, 1805, Moorsley no. 13632
Prior's Kitchen Durham,Church Commission, 1840, Moorsley no. 13633
Prior's Kitchen Durham,Church Commission, 1843, Moorsley no. 13634
Dept. Pal. & Dip. Durham, Tithe Awards, 1840, Moorsley
Dept. Pal. & Dip. Durham, Ordnance Survey maps, 1st ed. 1:2500 Durham XX.12
W. Hutchinson, 1787, History of...Durham, II, p. 725
R. Surtees, 1816, History of...Durham, I, pp. 211-212; Ian Nairn, 1964, A Townscape Gazetteer - County Durham, Architectural Review, Vol. 135 (1964) p 120; Hetton Local & Natural History Society, 2015, The Hetton Village Atlas p179; Dean and Chapter Moorsley Estate Plan, 1843 DCD E/AF/4/1
YEAR1
1990
YEAR2
1996
English, British
ADDITINF
Y
Class
Transport
COMP1
Barbara Harbottle
COMP2
Claire MacRae
Crossref
276
DAY1
20
DAY2
21
District
Gateshead and S Tyneside
Easting
435250
EASTING2
2706
Grid ref figure
8
Map Sheet
NZ36SE
MAP2
NE25NE
MONTH1
07
MONTH2
08
Grid Reference
NZ
NGR2
NZ
NMRNUMBER
LINEAR 293
Northing
564800
NORTHING2
5845
General Period
ROMAN
Specific Period
Roman 43 to 410
Place
Wardley
Description
It is generally agreed that this Roman road connected the fort at South Shields with the Roman road from Chester-le-Street to the Tyne. A considerable stretch of the road is still in use, from Jarrow Slake to Wrekenton at NZ 2812 5926. West of there it is now largely built over. Wright obtained a section at NZ 310614, where it was 16 feet wide, and another on the east side of Long Bank, Wrekenton, where it was 19 feet across. Until comparatively recently long stretches of the Wrekendyke formed parish boundaries.
SITEASS
Remember there are problems of location at each end, and there will be opportunities for fieldwork etc. on its west side north of the road to Sunderland.
Site Type: Broad
Road Transport Site
SITEDESC
It is generally agreed that this Roman road connected the fort at South Shields (E) with the Roman road from Chester-le-Street to the Tyne (W). Versions of the name are recorded from the C13. A considerable stretch of the road is still in use, from Jarrow Slake to Wrekenton at NZ 2812 5926. W of there it is now largely built over. Wright obtained a section at NZ 310614, where it was 16 ft wide, and another on the E side of Long Bank, Wrekenton, where it was 19 ft across. At High Eighton, NZ 2724 5860, however, he found nothing, and he argues that earlier antiquaries have not proved its line to the west either. Note that Selkirk has recently published an air photo which he believes may show the road running on. At its east end its route from Jarrow Slake to the fort is also unknown. Until comparatively recently long stretches of the Wrekendyke formed parish boundaries. A watching brief in 2005 during water mains renewal on Newcastle Road (A194) at Primrose Bridge, South Shields did not record any archaeological remains, however ground levels have been raised here for the creation of the modern road. Paul Bidwell argues for a pre-Hadrianic date for the Wrekendyke. Research by David Armstrong contained within the HER as additional information.
Site Name
Wrekendyke Roman road
Site Type: Specific
Road
HER Number
277
Form of Evidence
Documentary Evidence
Sources
<< HER 277 >> W. Hutchinson, 1787, History of...Durham, II, pp. 487-9
R. Surtees, 1820, History of...Durham, II, pp. 102, 136
J. Hodgson, 1832, Observations on the Roman Road called Wrekendyke, Archaeologia Aeliana, 1, II, pp. 123-36
W.H.D. Longstaffe, 1858, Durham before the Conquest,Proceedings of the Archaeological Institute, Newcastle, I, pp. 59-60
R.P. Wright, 1940, The Wrekendike and Roman road-junction on Gateshead Fell, Archaeologia Aeliana, 4, XVII, pp. 54-64
R. Selkirk, 1983, The Piercebridge Formula; P Bidwell and M Snape, 2002, The History and Setting of the Roman Fort at Newcastle upon Tyne, Archaeologia Aeliana, 5th Series, vol 31, p 257; DH Heslop, 2009, Newcastle and Gateshead before 1080, in Diana Newton and AJ Pollard, Newcastle and Gateshead before 1700, p. 7
YEAR1
1990
YEAR2
2018