English, British
Class
Industrial
COMP1
Jennifer Morrison
DAY1
27
District
Newcastle
Easting
426430
Grid ref figure
8
Map Sheet
NZ26SE
MONTH1
3
Grid Reference
NZ
Northing
564120
General Period
POST MEDIEVAL
Specific Period
Victorian 1837 to 1901
Place
Byker
Description
The site of this timber yard is shown on the 1st edition Ordnance Survey plan.
Site Type: Broad
Wood Processing Site
SITEDESC
Shown on 1st edition Ordnance Survey map {2}.
Site Name
Byker, Timber Yard
Site Type: Specific
Timber Yard
HER Number
4678
Form of Evidence
Documentary Evidence
Sources
<< HER 4678 >> Ove Arup & Partners, 1998, Lower Steenberg's Yard - Byker, Engineering Study
1st edition Ordnance Survey map, 1856
YEAR1
2002
English, British
ADDITINF
Y
AREA_STAT
Conservation Area
Class
Industrial
COMP1
Jennifer Morrison
COMP2
Rachel Grahame
DAY1
27
DAY2
10
District
Newcastle
Easting
426300
Grid ref figure
8
Map Sheet
NZ26SE
MONTH1
3
MONTH2
5
Grid Reference
NZ
Northing
564660
General Period
POST MEDIEVAL
Specific Period
Hanoverian 1714 to 1837
Place
Ouseburn
Description
As early as 1757 "Mr Hilcot" transferred his pottery business from the South Shore, Gateshead to the Ouseburn. In 1769 William Hillcoat had a factory in the Ouseburn and a shop on the quay. He appears as potter in the Directory of 1778. By 1786 a partnership took over: Backhouse, Hillcoat & Co. In 1790 the firm was Hillcoat, Brown & Backhouse; Brown being half owner. By 1801 Robert Yelloley took over the works, which existed well into the C19. All kinds of fine pottery were made, including cream ware. Shown on Wood's Plan of 1827 (owned by M. Elliot) and on Oliver's map of 1844.
Messrs T & J Thompson Flint Grinders & Earthenware Manufacturers were tenants of the Elliot family who owned the two flint grinding mills; Elliots were very successful, having begun with water-powered flint mills they acquired or had built the earthenware works that they subsequently let to Messrs T & J Thompson. The ground flint was for use in the earthenware trade, so it isn't surprising that Elliot also invested in that trade. Certainly by the 1830s, Elliot owns that pottery, as Thos Oliver records in his survey of 1830 (the pottery buildings - item 6 on map - freehold, Hy & Wm Elliot). Trade directories record T & J Thompson thus:
1827 Thompson, Thos & Co, flint & mineral grinders, Ouseburn and Thompson, T & J, earthenware manufacturers, Ouseburn Pottery.
1829 Thompson, Thos & Co, flint grinders, Ouseburn and Thompson, Thos & Jos, earthenware manufacturers, Ouseburn.
1831 Thompson, Thos, R Reay & John Harrison (57, 58, 58a) flint mill, terrace (back Stepney Bank) & terrace (foot of Stepney bank) Thos Oliver’s Survey & Schedule.
1833 Thompson, T & J, earthenware manufacturers, Ouseburn and Reay and Thompson, flint & mineral grinders, Ouseburn.
1834 Thompson, Thos & Jos, earthenware manufacturers, Ouseburn Pottery and Thompson, Thomas, flint grinders, Ouseburn.
1838 Thompson, T & J, earthenware manufacturers, Ouseburn and Reay, Thompson & Co, flint & mineral grinders, Ouseburn.
Could this be the 'Railway Bridge Pottery' run by E. Rogers between 1857-8? Rogers took over from Morrow and Parke. He enlarged the pottery but left in 1858, succeeded by William Blakey. Archaeological remains consisting of sandstone and brick walls were located during a 2010 watching brief by NPA relating to 19th and 20th century industrial use of the site. A brick structure was found during a WB in 2009.
Site Type: Broad
Pottery Manufacturing Site
SITEDESC
As early as 1757 "Mr Hilcot" transferred his pottery business from the South Shore, Gateshead to the Ouseburn. In 1769 William Hillcoat had a factory in the Ouseburn and a shop on the quay. He appears as potter in the Directory of 1778. By 1786 a partnership took over: Backhouse, Hillcoat & Co. In 1790 the firm was Hillcoat, Brown & Backhouse; Brown being half owner. By 1801 Robert Yelloley took over the works, which existed well into the C19. All kinds of fine pottery were made, including cream ware. Shown on Wood's Plan of 1827 (owned by M. Elliot) and on Oliver's map of 1844.
Messrs T & J Thompson Flint Grinders & Earthenware Manufacturers were tenants of the Elliot family who owned the two flint grinding mills; Elliots were very successful, having begun with water-powered flint mills they acquired or had built the earthenware works that they subsequently let to Messrs T & J Thompson. The ground flint was for use in the earthenware trade, so it isn't surprising that Elliot also invested in that trade. Certainly by the 1830s, Elliot owns that pottery, as Thos Oliver records in his survey of 1830 (the pottery buildings - item 6 on map - freehold, Hy & Wm Elliot). Trade directories record T & J Thompson thus:
1827 Thompson, Thos & Co, flint & mineral grinders, Ouseburn and Thompson, T & J, earthenware manufacturers, Ouseburn Pottery.
1829 Thompson, Thos & Co, flint grinders, Ouseburn and Thompson, Thos & Jos, earthenware manufacturers, Ouseburn.
1831 Thompson, Thos, R Reay & John Harrison (57, 58, 58a) flint mill, terrace (back Stepney Bank) & terrace (foot of Stepney bank) Thos Oliver’s Survey & Schedule.
1833 Thompson, T & J, earthenware manufacturers, Ouseburn and Reay and Thompson, flint & mineral grinders, Ouseburn.
1834 Thompson, Thos & Jos, earthenware manufacturers, Ouseburn Pottery and Thompson, Thomas, flint grinders, Ouseburn.
1838 Thompson, T & J, earthenware manufacturers, Ouseburn and Reay, Thompson & Co, flint & mineral grinders, Ouseburn.
Could this be the 'Railway Bridge Pottery' run by E. Rogers between 1857-8? Rogers took over from Morrow and Parke. He enlarged the pottery but left in 1858, succeeded by William Blakey. Archaeological remains consisting of sandstone and brick walls were located during a 2010 watching brief by NPA relating to 19th and 20th century industrial use of the site. A brick structure was found during a WB in 2009.
Site Name
Ouseburn Old Pottery
Site Type: Specific
Pottery Works
HER Number
4677
Form of Evidence
Documentary Evidence
Sources
<< HER 4677 >> Ove Arup & Partners, 1998, Lower Steenberg's Yard - Byker, Engineering Study
T. Oliver, 1844, Map of Newcastle and Gateshead
P.J. Davidson, 1986, Brickworks of the North East, pp 68-9
R.C. Bell, 1986, Maling and other Tyneside Pottery
Tyne and Wear County Council, 1981, Maling - A Tyneside Pottery
R.C. Bell, 1971, Tyneside Pottery
R.C. Bell & M.A.V. Gill, 1973, The Potteries of Tyneside
F. Buckley, 1929, Potteries on the Tyne and Other Northern Potteries during the C188, Archaeologia Aeliana, series 4, p68-82
D.K. Gray, 1985, Introduction to Maling
S. Moore & C. Ross, 1989, Maling, The Trademark of Excellence
J.T. Shaw, 1973, The Potteries of Wearside; information from Mike Greatbatch 2013 The Archaeological Practice Ltd., 2006, Foundry Lane, Ouseburn, Newcastle upon Tyne, Archaeological Assessment; NPA, 2010, Foundry Lane, Newcastle upon Tyne - Archaeological Watching Brief; NPA, 2009, Foundry Lane, Newcastle upon Tyne - Archaeological Watching Brief;
YEAR1
2002
YEAR2
2021
English, British
Class
Industrial
COMP1
Jennifer Morrison
DAY1
27
District
Newcastle
Easting
426150
Grid ref figure
8
Map Sheet
NZ26SE
MONTH1
3
Grid Reference
NZ
Northing
564480
General Period
POST MEDIEVAL
Specific Period
Victorian 1837 to 1901
Place
Ouseburn
Description
These works are shown on Oliver's map of Newcastle, 1844. The rise of the glass industry in the Ouseburn led to an increased demand for alkali (sodium carbonate and potassium carbonate) which could be produced by copperas works in a process which involved sulphuric acid. In a directory of 1821-2 the copperas manufacturer is listed as Angus Caleb & Co. The works had disappeared by 1855 but its yard and one of its kilns appear on the 1st edition Ordnance Survey plan of the area.
SITEASS
An archaeological evaluation at Woods Pottery in February 2004 revealed a brick wall possibly belonging to the copperas works. Prior to this, the site was used as a repository of waste from brick manufacture. Copperas is iron sulphate, resulting from atmospheric oxidation and decomposition of iron pyrites found in coal measures. When heated, oil of vitriol (concentrated sulphuric acid) is produced, which was used as a mordant in the dyeing industry in the eighteenth century and for making ink. Copperas was used from the mid C18 to late C19 in the Leblanc process for making soda. Its use declined when better ways of making sulphuric acid were discovered, when synthetic dyes were introduced and when the Solvay Process superseded the Leblanc (William Jones, 1996, Dictionary of Industrial Archaeology).
Site Type: Broad
Chemical Industry Site
SITEDESC
Shown on Oliver's map of 1844. The rise of the glass industry in the Ouseburn led to an increased demand for alkali (sodium carbonate and potassium carbonate) which could be produced by copperas works in a process which involved sulphuric acid. In a directory of 1821-2 the copperas manufacturer is listed as Angus Caleb & Co. The works had disappeared by 1855 but its yard and one of its kilns appear to retained on the 1st edition Ordnance Survey map.
Site Name
Ouseburn, Copperas Works
Site Type: Specific
Copperas Works
HER Number
4676
Form of Evidence
Documentary Evidence
Sources
<< HER 4676 >> Ove Arup & Partners, 1998, Lower Steenberg's Yard - Byker Engineering Study
T. Oliver, 1844, Map of Newcastle and Gateshead
K. Inkster & L. Trueman,1997, Stepney Bank Development, Archaeological Assessment
YEAR1
2002
English, British
Class
Monument <By Form>
COMP1
Jennifer Morrison
CONDITION
Good
DAY1
25
District
S Tyneside
Easting
436400
Grid ref figure
6
Map Sheet
NZ36NE
MATERIAL
Copper
MONTH1
3
Grid Reference
NZ
Northing
567900
General Period
ROMAN
Specific Period
Roman 43 to 410
Place
South Shields
Description
Two Roman brooches on display in the museum at Arbeia Roman Fort are unusual in belonging to a type rarely found outside Romania. They were found in the 19th century so it is impossible to say whether they were found in the fort or within the vicus. The first brooch is P-shaped and made of copper alloy. It is 53 metres long and 23 metres wide. It is plated with white metal and parts of the brooch are decorated with grooves, giving the impression of wire wrapped around the brooch. This type of brooch dates to end of the 2nd century A.D. or beginning of the 3rd century A.D. The South Shields example may be a later development. The second brooch is also P-shaped of copper alloy, measuring 43 metres in length and 20 metres in width. This too is plated in white metal and has simple decoration with 3 horizontal grooves and cut out strips. It dates to the first half of the 3rd century A.D. when the fort was at the height of its importance as a supply base. It is not clear why Roman brooches of Eastern European type should be found at South Shields. They show slight variations to those found in Dacia, so may have been made by a local craftsman, copying Dacian originals.
Site Type: Broad
Findspot
SITEDESC
Two Roman brooches on display in the museum at Arbeia Roman Fort are unusual in belonging to a type rarely found outside Romania. They were found in 19th century so it is impossible to say whether they were found in the fort or within the vicus. The first brooch is P-shaped and made of copper alloy. It is 53mm long and 23mm wide. It is plated with white metal. Parts of the brooch are decorated with grooves. This gives the impression of wire wrapped around the brooch. This type of brooch dates to end of C2 or beginning of C3. The South Shields example may be a later development. The second brooch is also P-shaped of copper alloy, measuring 43mm in length and 20mm in width. This too is plated in white metal. Simple decoration with 3 horizontal grooves and cut out strips. Dates to first half of C3 when the fort was at the height of its importance as a supply base. Not clear why Roman brooches of Eastern European type should be found at South Shields. They show slight variations to those found in Dacia, so may have been made by a local craftsman, copying Dacian originals {1}. Dated C3.
Site Name
Arbeia Roman Fort, Dacian Brooches
Site Type: Specific
Brooch
HER Number
4675
Form of Evidence
Find
Sources
<< HER 4675 >> M. Snape, 2001, Roman Brooches of Dacian Type found at South Shields Roman Fort, The Arbeia Journal, Vol 6-7, 1997-98 (2001), p 63-65; M.E. Snape, Roman Brooches, in Arbeia Magazine, pp 13-15
SURVIVAL
80-90%
YEAR1
2002
English, British
Class
Defence
COMP1
Jennifer Morrison
CONDITION
Fair
DAY1
25
District
S Tyneside
Easting
436400
Grid ref figure
6
Map Sheet
NZ36NE
MATERIAL
Copper
MONTH1
3
Grid Reference
NZ
Northing
567900
General Period
ROMAN
Specific Period
Roman 43 to 410
Place
South Shields
Description
Copper-alloy beads from a native British beaded torc were found during excavations north-east of the mid-Antonine principia at South Shields Roman Fort. The bead fragments are plain and simple in design. There are two separate beads, almost certainly a third, plus a further fragment. The beads are flat, three of them decorated with transverse grooves. The fourth piece is undecorated and smaller than the others, and may have been part of the bead resting against the neck. Similar examples of beads have been found at Corbridge and Settle. Beaded torcs are only found in Britain and usually in the north.
Site Type: Broad
Headquarters
SITEDESC
Copper-alloy beads from a native British beaded torc were found during excavations north-east of the mid-Antonine principia at South Shields Roman Fort. The bead fragments are plain and simple in design. There are two separate beads, almost certainly a third, plus a further fragment. The beads are flat, three of them decorated with transverse grooves. The fourth piece is undecorated and smaller than the others, and may have been part of the bead resting against the neck. Similar examples of beads have been found at Corbridge and Settle. Beaded torcs are only found in Britain and usually in the north. The beads are examples of a distinctive cruciform beam belonging to a native strung-bead torc {1}. Dated C2.
Site Name
Arbeia Roman Fort, Torc Beads
Site Type: Specific
Bead
HER Number
4674
Form of Evidence
Find
Sources
<< HER 4674 >> A.T. Croom, 2001, A Ring Mail Shirt from South Shields Roman Fort, The Arbeia Journal, Vol 6-7, 1997-98 (2001), p 60-63
SURVIVAL
40-59%
YEAR1
2002
English, British
Class
Domestic
COMP1
Jennifer Morrison
CONDITION
Good
DAY1
25
District
S Tyneside
Easting
436400
Grid ref figure
6
Map Sheet
NZ36NE
MATERIAL
Iron
MONTH1
3
Grid Reference
NZ
Northing
567900
General Period
ROMAN
Specific Period
Roman 43 to 410
Place
South Shields
Description
A complete ring mail shirt was found during excavations of barrack II at Arbeia Roman Fort in 1997. The barrack was constructed in the early 3rd century A.D. and destroyed by fire in the late 3rd century A.D. or early 4th century A.D.. The shirt was found in a thick layer of burnt daub from the collapsed walls of the barrack, in a lobby area containing a hearth in front of the doors leading to the residential area. The shirt had been sealed between layers of hot dry daub and thus survived in very good condition. The suite of rooms in which the shirt was found was possibly junior officers' accomodation. The shirt was of standard Roman construction, with four links looped on to one, with alternate lines of riveted and solid links. The wire used was 1-1.8 metres in diameter. Few complete Roman mail shirts have been recovered from Britain (a shirt has been found at Wallsend and another at Housesteads). After conservation the shirt weighed 5.440kg.
Site Type: Broad
Military Residence
SITEDESC
A complete ring mail shirt was found during excavations of barrack II at Arbeia Roman Fort in 1997. The barrack was constructed in early C3 and destroyed by fire in the late C3 or early C4. The shirt was found in a thick layer of burnt daub from the collapsed walls of the barrack, in a lobby area containing a hearth in front of the doors leading to the residential area. The shirt had been sealed between layers of hot dry daub and thus survived in very good condition. The suite of rooms in which the shirt was found was possibly junior officers' accommodation. The shirt was of standard Roman construction, with four links looped on to one, with alternate lines of riveted and solid links. The wire used was 1-1.8mm in diameter. Few complete Roman mail shirts have been recovered from Britain (a shirt has been found at Wallsend and another at Housesteads). After conservation the shirt weighed 5.440kg. One of the best surviving pieces of Roman iron to be found at Arbeia {1}. Dated C3-C4.
Site Name
South Shields Roman Fort, Ring Mail Shirt
Site Type: Specific
Mail Armour
HER Number
4673
Form of Evidence
Find
Sources
<< HER 4673 >> A.T. Croom, 2001, A Ring Mail Shirt from South Shields Roman Fort, The Arbeia Journal, Vol 6-7, 1997-98 (2001), p 55-60; Alexandra Croom, 2003, Finds spot: the last 50 years, Arbeia Magazine, No. 27, 2003, p 9
SURVIVAL
100%
YEAR1
2002
English, British
Class
Maritime Craft
COMP1
Jennifer Morrison
DAY1
22
District
S Tyneside
Easting
436700
Grid ref figure
6
Map Sheet
NZ36NE
MONTH1
3
Grid Reference
NZ
NMRNUMBER
NZ 36 NE 659
Northing
568200
General Period
ROMAN
Specific Period
Roman 43 to 410
Place
South Shields
Description
It is possible that a Roman shipwreck lies off the Herd Sand, but there is no conclusive evidence for this. Over the last 150 years many coins (e.g. HER ref. 908) (64 coins up to 2001) and other objects, Roman and Medieval (HER ref. 911-13, 927, 928, 936, 929), have been found on the beach. These may have come from wrecks, or dredged from the river bed at Newcastle and redeposited at the river mouth. The objects could also have been dumped here in ships' ballast. Another possibility is that they were deposited for ritual purposes. Factors in favour of the shipwreck theory include the fact that a Roman patera found in the 1880s was said to have been found in the "wreckage of a sailing ship". Around the same time, Robert Blair, a local antiquary, recalled having seen the remains of a small ship to the east of Salmon's ballast hill (i.e. on Herd Sand). Reports of shipwrecks in this area were frequent in 17th century, and there are references to wrecks here as early as 1195. Arguments against the theory that the objects were brought here from dredging material or ballast are that the objects do not display the degree of wear you would expect from something washed in from the far out to sea. The coins found on the Herd Sand are mostly silver denarii, and most were issued between the reigns of Nero and Marcus Aurelius (1st & 2nd centuries A.D.). It has been suggestd, therefore, that the coins could represent a hoard, perhaps savings in transit which, with the other finds, came from a ship carrying a soldier of legio VIII Augusta (inscribed on the shield-boss) which was wrecked while entering the Tyne.
SITEASS
Bidwell himself acknowledges that it is not certain that the Roman objects come from a wreck. Underwater investigation may locate its remains. [the Archaeological Diving Unit from St. Andrews University failed to find the remains of a Roman wreck when they carried out a survey in 2001].
Site Type: Broad
Wreck
SITEDESC
It is possible that a Roman shipwreck lies off the Herd Sand. Over the last 150 years many coins (SMR 908) (64 coins to date in 2001) and other objects, Roman and Medieval (SMR 911-13, 927, 928, 936, 929), have been found on the beach. These may have come from wrecks, or dredged from the river bed at Newcastle and redeposited at the river mouth. The objects could also have been dumped here in ships' ballast. Another possibility is that they were deposited for ritual purposes. Factors in favour of the shipwreck theory include the fact that a Roman patera found in the 1880s was said to have been found in the "wreckage of a sailing ship". Around the same time, Robert Blair, a local antiquary, recalled having seen the remains of a small ship to the east of Salmon's ballast hill (i.e. on Herd Sand) {2}. Reports of shipwrecks in this area were frequent in C17, and there are references to wrecks here as early as 1195. P. Bidwell argues against the theory that the objects were brought here from dredging material from the River Tyne, because it would have been dumped well out to sea where it could not be washed back into the new harbour. He argues against the ballast theory because the objects do not display the degree of wear you would expect from something washed in from the sea bed. The coins found on the Herd Sand are mostly silver denarii, and most were issued between the reigns of Nero and Marcus Aurelius (C1 and C2). Bidwell therefore suggests that the coins could represent a hoard, perhaps savings in transit. The three paterae, shield boss and cheek-piece found on the Sand could have been used/belonged to the later C2. Bidwell therefore suggests that these items came from a ship carrying a soldier of legio VIII Augusta (inscribed on the shield-boss) which became wrecked while entering the Tyne. Legio VIII Augusta were based in Strasbourg in Germany, and Bidwell suggests that reinforcements from Germany may have been required during the recorded revolt in the reign of Commodus {1}. Dated C2.
Site Name
Herd Sand, possible Roman Shipwreck
Site Type: Specific
Wreck
HER Number
4672
Form of Evidence
Implied Evidence
Sources
<< HER 4672 >> P. Bidwell, 2001, A Probable Roman Shipwreck on the Herd Sand at South Shields, The Arbeia Journal, Vol 6-7, 1997-98 (2001), p 1-23
R.C Bosanquet & I.A. Richmond, 1936, A Roman Skillet from South Shields, Archaeologia Aeliana, series 4, 13, p 139
R. Blair, 1886, Proceedings of the Society of Antiquaries of Newcastle, 2, 2 (1885-6) P 334
YEAR1
2002
English, British
Class
Defence
COMP1
Jennifer Morrison
DAY1
22
District
N Tyneside
Easting
437400
Grid ref figure
6
HISTORY_TOPIC
World Wars
Map Sheet
NZ36NE
MONTH1
3
Grid Reference
NZ
Northing
569600
General Period
20TH CENTURY
Specific Period
Second World War 1939 to 1945
Place
Tynemouth
Description
A Pillbox constructed during World War Two.
SITEASS
The pillbox is the most familiar type of C20 defensive building. Sometimes referred to as defence posts, blockhouses or police posts. Concrete pillboxes were first used by the Russians in the Russo-Japanese War. The concept was copied by the Germans in WW1 and later by the British. The majority of WW2 pillboxes were associated with beach defences, stop-lines and nodal points. Some were sited to defend coastal batteries, airfields, radar stations and factories. More than 18,000 were built during 1940. In June 1940 branch FW3 of the War Office Directorate of Fortifications and Works issued designs for about a dozen standard pillboxes. In practice a multiplicity of designs arose. However most pillboxes consist of a basic squat, heavily constructed building, usually flat-roofed, no more than 1.98m high and quadrilateral, polygonal or circular in plan. There were one or two entrances, sometimes protected by a porch or wall. They all have a series of horizontal slits (firing loops, loopholes or embrasures) to provide interlocking fields of fire over the anticipated direction of attack. Most pillboxes were designed for rifles or light machine guns. More heavily armed examples had Vickers machine guns, anti-tank guns or Hotchkiss guns. Pillbox walls are almost invariably of concrete, sometimes with brick shuttering or stone facing {Defence of Britain Handbook, 1995, pp 79-82}.
Site Type: Broad
Fortification
SITEDESC
Pillbox {1}.
Site Name
Tynemouth, Pillbox
Site Type: Specific
Pillbox
HER Number
4671
Form of Evidence
Demolished Building
Sources
<< HER 4671 >> A. Rudd, of Wartime Defences
YEAR1
2002
English, British
Class
Defence
COMP1
Jennifer Morrison
DAY1
22
District
N Tyneside
Easting
436600
Grid ref figure
6
HISTORY_TOPIC
World Wars
Map Sheet
NZ37SE
MONTH1
3
Grid Reference
NZ
Northing
570800
General Period
20TH CENTURY
Specific Period
Second World War 1939 to 1945
Place
Cullercoats
Description
A Pillbox constructed during World War Two.
SITEASS
The pillbox is the most familiar type of C20 defensive building. Sometimes referred to as defence posts, blockhouses or police posts. Concrete pillboxes were first used by the Russians in the Russo-Japanese War. The concept was copied by the Germans in WW1 and later by the British. The majority of WW2 pillboxes were associated with beach defences, stop-lines and nodal points. Some were sited to defend coastal batteries, airfields, radar stations and factories. More than 18,000 were built during 1940. In June 1940 branch FW3 of the War Office Directorate of Fortifications and Works issued designs for about a dozen standard pillboxes. In practice a multiplicity of designs arose. However most pillboxes consist of a basic squat, heavily constructed building, usually flat-roofed, no more than 1.98m high and quadrilateral, polygonal or circular in plan. There were one or two entrances, sometimes protected by a porch or wall. They all have a series of horizontal slits (firing loops, loopholes or embrasures) to provide interlocking fields of fire over the anticipated direction of attack. Most pillboxes were designed for rifles or light machine guns. More heavily armed examples had Vickers machine guns, anti-tank guns or Hotchkiss guns. Pillbox walls are almost invariably of concrete, sometimes with brick shuttering or stone facing {Defence of Britain Handbook, 1995, pp 79-82}.
Site Type: Broad
Fortification
SITEDESC
Pillbox {1}.
Site Name
Cullercoats, Pillbox
Site Type: Specific
Pillbox
HER Number
4670
Form of Evidence
Demolished Building
Sources
<< HER 4670 >> A. Rudd, of Wartime Defences
YEAR1
2002
English, British
Class
Defence
COMP1
Jennifer Morrison
COMP2
Clare Henderson
DAY1
22
DAY2
18
District
N Tyneside
Easting
435365
Grid ref figure
10
HISTORY_TOPIC
World Wars
Map Sheet
NZ37SE
MONTH1
3
MONTH2
11
Grid Reference
NZ
Northing
572843
General Period
20TH CENTURY
Specific Period
Second World War 1939 to 1945
Place
Whitley Bay
Description
A Pillbox constructed during World War Two.
SITEASS
The pillbox is the most familiar type of C20 defensive building. Sometimes referred to as defence posts, blockhouses or police posts. Concrete pillboxes were first used by the Russians in the Russo-Japanese War. The concept was copied by the Germans in WW1 and later by the British. The majority of WW2 pillboxes were associated with beach defences, stop-lines and nodal points. Some were sited to defend coastal batteries, airfields, radar stations and factories. More than 18,000 were built during 1940. In June 1940 branch FW3 of the War Office Directorate of Fortifications and Works issued designs for about a dozen standard pillboxes. In practice a multiplicity of designs arose. However most pillboxes consist of a basic squat, heavily constructed building, usually flat-roofed, no more than 1.98m high and quadrilateral, polygonal or circular in plan. There were one or two entrances, sometimes protected by a porch or wall. They all have a series of horizontal slits (firing loops, loopholes or embrasures) to provide interlocking fields of fire over the anticipated direction of attack. Most pillboxes were designed for rifles or light machine guns. More heavily armed examples had Vickers machine guns, anti-tank guns or Hotchkiss guns. Pillbox walls are almost invariably of concrete, sometimes with brick shuttering or stone facing {Defence of Britain Handbook, 1995, pp 79-82}.
Site Type: Broad
Fortification
SITEDESC
Pillbox {1}.
Site Name
Whitley Bay, Pillbox
Site Type: Specific
Pillbox
HER Number
4669
Form of Evidence
Demolished Building
Sources
<< HER 4669 >> A. Rudd, of Wartime Defences
YEAR1
2002
YEAR2
2020